台灣資通安全研究與教學中心與____________公司

台灣資通安全研究與教學中心與____________公司

產學合作備忘錄(範本)

文號：

	台灣資通安全研究與教學中心	（以下簡稱甲方）
立備忘錄人
	公司	（以下簡稱乙方）

一、台灣資通安全研究與教學中心與___________公司（以下簡稱雙方）為進行產學合作，特簽訂本備忘錄，以為雙方進行具體合作之依據。

二、甲方推薦_______大學_______教授，承接研發乙方____________計畫，以協助乙方開發相關產品之技術。

三、乙方應依受推薦教授所服務學校之規定，簽訂產學計畫合約執行本專案計畫。

四、乙方應提供執行計畫所需之相關軟硬體工具或裝置予甲方，並給與甲方參與計畫人員必要之操作訓練。

五、雙方因本合作案而知悉或持有他方之技術資料、營業秘密等，應負保密之義務，非經他方書面同意不得洩漏予第三人。雙方同意任一方違反本備忘錄而致他方遭受損害，違約方應負相關法律責任。

六、雙方合作成果之智慧財產權及其衍生利益之分配，應本雙方互惠之原則於合約內訂定之。

七、本備忘錄自簽訂日起生效，為期____年，期滿經協商後可辦理續約。

八、本備忘錄正本壹式貳份，由雙方各執壹份為憑。

簽署人

甲方：

台灣資通安全研究與教學中心

代表人/職稱：李德財/總召集人

(簽章)

地址：

乙方：

公司

代表人/職稱：

(簽章)

統一編號：

地址：

中 華 民 國 九 十 六 年 九 月 日

中 华 武 术 协 会

本社团是一家非利益用途的慈善团体，立誓以尊老爱幼、扶弱助残为宗旨。除了发扬中华传统文化之外，亦希

望得到善心人士的鼎力支持，并且透过义演所得筹款来协

助贫苦大众，造福人群。

主要業務:
開張開幕、宣傳活動、喜慶典禮、廣告電影、慈善籌款、

賀誕巡遊之獅青陣表演，亦同時本社将筹募活动资金作为

赈灾、济贫、医药、教育、文化。

服務要求:

由策劃、統籌以至典禮完畢都為客戶提供一站式服務，同

時亦可按照客戶的要求，為客戶撰寫国术表演建議書，從

而使客戶能享有更合適的龍獅表演。

紀律嚴謹:
本龍獅團向來著重運動員的儀表及操守，每次演出均要求

運動員穿著整潔的制服，並於表演前半小時到達場地作準備，務求令表演質素達至最高。

中华武术协会国术表演服務:

如欲查詢有關表演收費或報價資料，


２００９年新春表演現以接受預約

请支持救源计划，留下个人资料，我们会尽快与您联络。

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

支 持 者 个 人 资 料
SUPPORTER PERSONAL DETAIL

姓名：
Name：

电邮：
Email：

电话：
Phone：

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

万民敬仰の拿督宋瑞源从辉煌走向落魄，令人惋惜……

前砂劳越州立法议会议长、前马来西亚古晋国会选区国会议员暨前古晋浮罗岸选区州议员、前古晋市议会主席兼首任南市市长、前东马武术总会总会长—拿督宋瑞源。

他曾经连任了四届的国会暨州议席，雄霸大马政坛二十余年，无论在国、州选中，都立于不败之地，他在大选中的获胜记录迄今仍未有人突破，有“独孤求败”之称，也被政界誉为“长胜将军”。

他因此倍受人联党与国阵器重，受委人联党副主席、出任古晋南市市长及砂州立法议会议长。同时，为一名深获民心的政治人物。

在他任职期间，砂劳越的人民是全世界最幸福的人民，人民们一旦面对难关，他就会全力为我们解决。由于与生俱来过分的善良心，导致他面临今日悲惨的局面。

他是唯一一位视人民如宝般看待的官员，因而他不惜一切把所有市民的拖欠债务都揽上身，耗尽所有钱财，殆尽一切房产，被负债市民的债主起诉至破产。他为国阵从反对党手中夺回沦陷多年的领土，为老百姓争取权利，提供一个温馨的快乐天堂，不求任何回报。而他得到了什么，如今他一无所有，无檐遮头，一日三餐都成问题。

虽然如此，他却从未有半句怨言。他真的很伟大，“勤政爱民，舍己为人”，只有他才做的到。

如果各位还有一丝怜悯之心，就请支持我们敬爱的源兄，一同奏请让他恢复职权，即：砂劳越州立法议会议长、马来西亚古晋国会选区国会议员暨前古晋浮罗岸选区州议员、古晋南市市长的身份。只有在他的管治下，百姓们才会感到温暖与幸福。

政坛常胜将军“拿督宋瑞源” 饮漂白剂图自杀

2006年4月27日，人联党“福将”拿督宋瑞源怀疑因私人问题一时想不开，于其住家饮漂白剂自寻短见。　　　　

宋瑞源是在当天上午11时许，于其位于肯尼山庄的住家内，服漂白剂企图自杀，幸由民防局拯救员开救护车，紧急将他送往医院急诊部，他在送往医院途中不断呕出腹内的漂白剂。
　
由于情况不严重，宋瑞源在接受洗胃医疗后已无大碍，不过必须留院观察。

他是因为被一家本地建筑公司入禀法庭，索取32万4655令吉34仙的债务，而于2000年8月22日被古晋高庭判入穷籍。

Our Loving Datuk Song

SUPP is technically a defunct party. After Datuk Song Swee Guan, SUPP has not produced a half decent candidate. And look at what happened to Datuk Song. He was a nice guy, and best to my knowledge, incorrupt. The people loved him and under his administration, Kuching roared like a tiger instead of a cat as its name suggested.

However, Datuk Song was too nice a man. People took advantage of his niceties and he was driven to bankruptcy because of his generosity in being the guarantor for student, private and business loans.


Since then, DAP has taken over and let’s face it, DAP definitely has candidates which are superior in quality.

Song should face the Music

On 22 August, the Kuching High Court declared SUPP/BN MP for Bandar Kuching Song Swee Guan (also Padungan State Assemblyman and Sarawak State Legislative Assembly Speaker) a bankrupt.

Song's bankruptcy highlights the inadequacy of the present system of financial accountability and transparency among politicians, senior public servants and judges in Malaysia. Presently, all Barisan Nasional politicians only declare their assets to the Prime Minister. Presumably, opposition politicians do the same to their respective party chiefs.

But this system is far from satisfactory. Aliran has always called upon those who aspire for office to declare their assets publicly and upon those elected to update those declarations annually.

How is it possible for Song, who held three salaried positions, to be declared a bankrupt? In the last parliament, Song also held three salaried positions: Kuching MP, Padungan state seat representative, and Kuching City South Mayor. What is it about Song's lifestyle and his financial dealings that led him into this impasse?

Aliran feels that Song, as an elected representative, should come clean and explain his situation publicly. Apparently he was involved in business while he claimed three salaries. And apparently his bankruptcy is a result of his business dealings going bust. If so, how long have these problems been festering? Was Song already in trouble before the November 1999 elections? Why then did SUPP/BN re-nominate him? Or are his problems of recent origin? The electorate has a right to know.

Aliran is concerned that the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) plans to raise funds from among supporters to bail out Song. Unless the public is informed about the reasons for Song's bankruptcy, there should be no bailout using funds raised from the public.

Like in the peninsula, there is too much patronage, shady-dealings, and overlap between politics and business in Sarawak. A lot is hidden from public scrutiny. This aversion to accountability and transparency among our elected representatives only breeds unhealthy ties between businessmen and politicians and encourages corruption.

Ironically, in the aftermath of the 1997 High Court decision that declared void the BN victory in the Bukit Begunan state seat in 1996 on account of "massive vote-buying", SUPP President and Sarawak Deputy Chief Minister Dr. George Chan said "money politics was very obvious and had infected the state."

Aliran is thus disappointed that Dr. Chan has yet to heed his own words and start wiping out money politics within his own party, let alone Sarawak.

As for Song and SUPP, the only honourable choice for him is to immediately resign from all his seats. This time, Aliran calls on the electorate of Kuching and Padungan to insist that all electoral candidates first declare their assets in all daily newspapers before elections.

Anil Netto
Executive Committee
1 September 2000